Обговорення користувача:Andriy
Андрію, скористайся веб-щоденниками.
Якщо знову порушуватимеш правила Вікіпедії наведені далі, будеш заблокований. Частину цих правил я вже тобі прямо наводив, решта взяті із посилань, які я теж наводив.
До того ж твої посилання на комерційні сайти - явний спам.
Через твоє небажання додержуватись правил, твоя сторінка блокується доти, доки ти не робитимеш щось стосовне до мети Вікіпедії -- Ілля 10:58, 25 березня 2006 (UTC)
m:User_page, en:Wikipedia:User_page
What can I have on my user page?
Anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It's a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider. Instead, think of it as a way of organizing the work that you will be doing on the articles in Wikipedia, and also a way of helping other editors to understand who they're working with.
Generally, you should avoid any substantial content that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Examples include:
- A weblog relating your non-Wikipedia activities
- Extensive discussion not related to Wikipedia
- Excessive personal information (more than a couple of pages)
- Opinion pieces not related to Wikipedia or other non-encyclopedic material
- Games, roleplaying sessions, and other things that fall into "entertainment" rather than "writing an encyclopedia," particularly if they involve people who are not active participants in the project.
- Communications with people uninvolved with the project
en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought
Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses. Please leave the following out of Wikipedia:
4. Personal essays or Blogs that state your particular opinions about a topic. Wikipedia is supposed to compile human knowledge. It is not a vehicle to make personal opinions become part of human knowledge. See Wikipedia:No original research. In the unusual situation where the opinions of a single individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. Personal essays on topics relating to Wikipedia are welcome at Meta. There is a Wikipedia fork at Wikinfo that encourages personal opinions in articles.
5. Opinions on current affairs is a particular case of the previous item. Although current affairs may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes" (i.e. passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced so as to put entries for current affairs in a reasonable perspective. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete.
6.Discussion forums. Please try to stay on the task of creating an encyclopedia. You can chat with folks on their user talk pages, and should resolve problems with articles on the relevant talk pages, but please do not take discussion into articles. There are a number of early-stage projects that attempt to use a wiki for discussion and debate.
For a wiki-like site that will publish your original thoughts, see Everything2.
Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files
Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files.
Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider
You may not host your own website, blog, or wiki at Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages are not:
1. User pages. Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they are used for information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet. The focus of User pages should not be social networking but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration.
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of items of information. That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. While there is a continuing debate about the encyclopedic merits of several classes of entries, current consensus is that Wikipedia articles are not:
2. Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as quotations, aphorisms or persons. If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are famous because they are associated with or significantly contributed to the list topic. Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference.
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball
Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. In particular:
1. Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. If preparation for the event isn't already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented. Examples of appropriate topics include 2008 U.S. presidential election, and 2012 Summer Olympics. By comparison, the 2028 U.S. presidential election and 2032 Summer Olympics are not considered appropriate article topics because nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. A schedule of future events may also be appropriate.
-- Ілля 10:58, 25 березня 2006 (UTC)
Нарешті
Нарешті надійшло просвітління!--Albedo @ 04:16, 6 травня 2006 (UTC)